* * * *
A loved one of mine was once in
a very complicated situation, one so complicated that it would eventually have
to be settled in court – I once went to court in support of this loved one.
Here’s where it gets interesting: this was my first time ever stepping into a
court house, let alone seeing a case unfold in such a setting. What I witnessed
was far from what I expected. Seeing the way the judge went from one case to
the next, the performance-like expositions of the lawyers, plaintiffs, and
defendants, I never once felt the weight of the law in the situation. Rather, I
felt like I was back in high school competitive speech, watching the next round
unravel. The laughable nature of it all completely altered my perspective on
the law and justice forever. I’m much more cynical about it now.
The Courtroom Drama is not one
of my more favored subgenres, thus I’ve not seen too many films in the category.
Out of the ones I have seen, no film
has captured the ridiculousness of the court of law quite like The Insult. That word again –
ridiculous. The Insult is where a court
case starts a domino effect that eventually results in civil unrest. All over a
simple verbal insult.
It is present day Beirut. Tony
Hanna (Adel Karam) is living a decent, working-class life with his wife Shirine
(Rita Hayek), who is pregnant with their child. They are Lebanese Christians.
Meanwhile, Yasser (Kamel El Basha), a Palestinian, earns his living as a
construction worker. He is working on a city block when a splash of water falls
on his head – it is from Tony, who was watering his plants, due to an illegally
placed drain on his balcony. Yasser is irritated, but takes it upon himself to
correct the drain. As soon as it is fixed, Tony smashes it with a hammer. “Fucking
prick,” Yasser mutters.
And there is our titular
insult.
Tony is outraged by it. Yasser’s
company attempts to make it up to him, but all without an apology directly from
Tony, which he demands. At one point, Yasser approaches Tony, perhaps to
apologize, but Tony can only unleash a vocal tirade, at one point exclaiming “I
wish Ariel Sharon would have wiped all of you out!” Yasser returns Tony’s vocal
offense with a punch, resulting in two broken ribs. Yasser is put in jail for
assault, and the situation is taken to court. All Tony wants is an apology out
of Yasser, which he does not give. A stalemate hits the court, and the case is
dismissed. Tony is infuriated by the court. He goes to a lawyer, still
hell-bent on getting this settled. On the flip side, a lawyer approaches
Yasser, who believes Yasser was justified in his assault per the penal code.
When I call The Insult ridiculous, I mean that in
the best way possible. It’s interesting to note that director Doueiri served as
a camera operator on Reservoir Dogs, Pulp
Fiction, and Jackie Brown. It is
very clear that Doueiri took notes from Quentin Tarantino, because The Insult’s dialogue is always riveting.
That combined with a sense that the walls are always closing in, The Insult
possesses a combustible energy on the verge of exploding, and these exemplary
qualities shine brightest during the courtroom sequences.
A lesser film would have the
viewers asking “Why don’t these two just get over themselves?” But it works
here. At the heart of The Insult is
two men buried in their own pride. The grayness of their exchanges makes their
situation all the more interesting: there is no character in the right or
wrong. Yes, Yasser did insult Tony, but Tony’s remark about Ariel Sharon is
enough to ignite a wildfire within anybody (this is all made the more powerful
from the performances from their respective actors).
The case eventually catches
national attention. The politics and history surrounding the fact that the two
men are Lebanese Christian & Palestinian stirs the country’s emotions. The
gallery gets louder and more hostile with each hearing. One hearing eventually
leads to physical exchanges, and that leads to civil unrest. Riots break out, innocent
casualties ensue, and the police are put on high-alert. As ludicrous as it
sounds, the scenario always seems plausible, which is also why it is so
disturbing.
I’m at a really intense
tug-of-war with myself in deciding between a 3.5 or a 4 for The Insult. My lack of knowledge with
the politics of the situation left me lost at times. In all fairness, this is
my fault, but The Insult is very
concerned with its politics without clear exposition - until the climax, that
is (I also admit that this is probably why this review comes off as rather clunky). But as much as it is concerned with its politics, it never forgets that
there are human beings at the center of this. As lost as I may have been from
time to time, The Insult always had
me gripped to my seat in thrilled unease, and for these reasons I award it a 4.
The Insult is one of the nominees for
the Best Foreign Picture of 2017. Whether it is deserving of the award, I
cannot say – I’m yet to see the other nominees. But I can say with complete
confidence that the nomination is fully deserved.
No comments:
Post a Comment