The Children Are Watching Us (1944)
Directed by Vittorio de Sica
* * ½
Prico (Luciano De Ambrosis) is
the son of Nina (Isa Pola) and Andrea (Emilio Cigoli). They live a pretty
comfortable middle class life, but everything changes when Nina is inexplicably
nowhere to be found one day. As events unfold, it is revealed that she has run
off with a man she has been having an affair with, but she returns a few days
later for her son’s sake. As time goes by, Nina and Andrea make an effort to
rekindle, but things just can’t be quite the same, and as they try to pick up
the pieces, they seem to forget that they have a child that needs tending to.
This is only my third
experience with the seminal Vittorio de Sica, following my viewings of the
excellent Umberto D. and Bicycle Thieves, the latter of which
fully deserves its reputation as one of the greatest films of all time, but I
must say that The Children Are Watching
Us disappointed me somewhat. I have mentioned this a while back; I was
fairly young when my parents divorced, and for De Sica to make a film about
bearing witness to parental strife from the child’s perspective is a bold move
(especially in 1944), but the film spends a bit too much time with the parents
to the point that it feels jagged.
While the performances aren’t
anything spectacular, they carried the film along just fine. It also moves
along at a good pace, not to mention it never overstays its welcome, clocking
in at a little over 80 minutes. If anything, there is an absolutely incredible
nightmare sequence that bridges the first and second acts that made the film
worth it. The Children Are Watching Us
is not a bad film by any means, and it certainly has elements that make it
worth watching, but the ultimate result is somewhat mediocre – after all, this
is made by the man who would direct Bicycle
Thieves just a few years later.
Fresh (1994)
Directed by Boaz Yakin
* * * ½
Fresh (Sean Nelson) may be
only 12 years old, but he’s one tough kid. Living in inner-city Brooklyn, he
makes good money as a drug courier for local dealers Esteban (Giancarlo Esposito)
and Corky (Ron Brice). His intelligence and honesty have earned him great
respect across the board, but Fresh’s ambitions don’t lie with a future in
crime (if I’m not mistaken, his very first line in the film is “I gotta’ get to
school”). His relationship with Esteban reaches levels of enraging complexity,
though, when he begins fooling around with Fresh’s crack-addicted sister
(N’Bushe Wright).
Though Fresh is a plot-driven narrative, the true driving force behind the
film is its observance (and subsequent insinuations) of its characters and
situations. Fresh takes its time
introducing us into its world with meticulous detail into these characters’
lives. Take, for instance, a scene where Fresh sells drugs on the street.
Instead of it being a simple transaction, we take Fresh’s POV and glances at
various colleagues (hidden in plain sight) for their approval to do the deal –
we don’t just watch their lives, we experience
them. We become so involved that the film sometimes gut-punches us, leaving
our mouths completely agape.
Of course, at the core of
everything is Sean Nelson’s performance, and this kid carries the entire weight
of this film like it was a feather. The supporting cast is also terrific,
especially the criminally underrated Giancarlo Esposito, who I didn’t realize
was so versatile until watching Fresh. Granted,
there are a couple of things that prevent this from being a perfect 4 – Samuel
L. Jackson plays Fresh’s estranged father. They meet every so often (in
secrecy) to play chess together, where chess almost serves as life lessons for
Fresh. The film clearly wants Jackson’s character to be important, but has
nowhere near enough screen time to possess the presence the character requires.
Additionally, the music is unbelievably stock. I know it’s superficial, but it
was almost laughable in just how generic it was. I must say that I do question
the plausibility of Fresh’s plot in the film’s final act, but I’ll let it
slide. On the whole, Fresh is
riveting urban cinema.
Klute (1971)
Directed by Alan J. Pakula
* *
Private Investigator John
Klute (Donald Sutherland) has been hired to track down the disappearance of Tom
Gruneman (Robert Milli). The stepping stone to the case: an obscene letter
addressed to a New York City prostitute named Bree Daniels (Jane Fonda). Klute
tracks Bree down, wire taps her phone, and keeps a close eye on her activities.
Soon, he begins asking her questions. She declines to cooperate, but eventually
begins warming up to Klute. Before too long, Bree becomes an accomplice of
sorts to Klute as he presses forward with his investigation into the
disturbingly seedy underground of New York lifestyles.
I once heard comedian
Jacqueline Frances (who uses her experience as an exotic dancer as the basis
for her comedy) call Klute one of the
most accurate portrayals of sex work ever committed to film. Frances’s
statement caught my attention, and additional research has led me to various
opinions that the movie should have been called Bree instead of Klute. I
wish I could agree with this notion. Though Bree is certainly the most
interesting character in the film (her conversations with her therapist, as
brief as they are, are absolutely fascinating), there’s still not enough
material with her to make the film worth watching for anybody wanting a solid
thriller or an interesting portrait of prostitution.
It’s still funny that they
name the movie after Klute, because he is the most boring character in the
movie. There’s always been a sort of unsettling enigma to Donald Sutherland’s
minimal approach to acting that I usually really like, but his character is
just a blank slate. In turn, the chemistry that the duo of Klute and Bree
requires is completely non-existent. Even then, though, I didn’t find the
mystery all that interesting to begin with. Top it off with a rushed climax
(though I’ll admit that there’s a moment where Bree gets a phone call to hear a
tape recording of herself – that was very effective) and this was just an
overall unsatisfying movie.
No comments:
Post a Comment