In the world of cinema, I've
always found the use of term "indie" a bit too liberal, as anything
remotely outside the mainstream assembly line of films seem to be automatically
referred to as "indie". Granted, I don't have much room to get huffy
about it. After all, technically speaking, it's simply an abbreviation of
"independent". Fine by me, but I've always found that
"indie" defines a very specific brand of independent filmmaking, one
that is stylistically (and many times visually) colorful with a signature
quirk, wit, and edge. More often than not, they're charming movies in spite of
the commonly morose subject matter - loss, grief, ennui, just to name a few
topics - and how fascinating that no matter how quirky and charming the usual
"indie" film is, it always remains grounded in its dark subject
matter.
Though my desire to make a
name for myself as a filmmaker isn't as strong as it used to be, it is still a
goal of mine to independently write, produce, and direct a film at some point
in my life. Because of this, I have a soft spot for indie films, even at their
most laughably stereotypical. It was only natural that I approach the work of
Jim Jarmusch sooner or later. I had not only read about his movies (most of
which sounded very interesting), but I also noticed that a good handful of his
titles were in the Criterion Collection, which is almost always enough to pique
my interest in any movie. I was lucky enough to find a used Criterion copy of
Stranger Than Paradise, which I snagged right away and immediately watched when
I got home. This was the equivalent of me tripping over a rock and falling into
the rabbit hole.
One of the first words that
comes to mind when I think Jarmusch is "cool". Imagine an Andrew
Eldritch-lookalike sitting at the edge of a hole-in-the-wall bar, a cigarette
in one hand and a drink in the other, looking ponderously off into the
distance. He's not asking for your attention, but you can't help but be drawn
to him. A conversation with him might seem at first like an insignificant chat,
but there was something about the way the conversation carried on with this guy
that unveiled an undiscovered beauty in something as simple and unremarkable as
everyday small-talk.What I'm getting at is this: if a human manifestation of
the typical Jim Jarmusch film existed, it would be something like that.
And what I love most about
Jarmusch is the humility that runs strongly throughout his work. There's plenty
of room for debate here, but for me, he never seems like he's trying to be
cool, edgy, unique, or anything like that (or at least trying too hard,
anyway), contrary to the dime-a-dozen indie filmmakers out there today who are
so desperate for the attention of cinephile audiences. Jarmusch always remains
grounded in the seemingly unremarkable state of his characters and stories, and
lets his movies play out as such. What he does instead, however, is honing in
on that regularness and brings out the beauty in it. Even in otherwise
less-than-stellar films like Coffee and Cigarettes, there is still success
found in their reserved nature.
As I wrote that last
paragraph, I had films like Night on Earth and Paterson in mind, and while my
previous statements ring plenty true to those films, I doubt anybody would call
the characters something like Ghost Dog: The Way of the Samurai "everyday
people" (in that film's case being hitmen and the mafia). Even in movies
like these, Jarmusch never, ever forgets what makes his films so charming, and
continues to remain in the foundation of everyday charms...even in films about
African American hitmen who live by the code of the samurai.
That said, this Jarmuschian
foundation, so to speak, sometimes works against him. Case in point being Ghost
Dog: The Way of the Samurai, as a matter of fact. While not a bad movie by any
means (and we'll be getting to that one very soon), I felt overall that it was
a very underwhelming experience, which is double-disappointing considering the
originality and coolness of the subject matter, especially the protagonist.
But I digress, because more
often than not, Jarmusch has delivered one unique and unforgettable movie
experience after another, even at his weakest points. While I've not seen every
single one of his movies at the time I'm writing this personal introduction,
the strong points currently outweigh the weak ones, and considering the man's
track record, I doubt that paradigm will shift. I've been wanting to start this
'All About the Masters' series for a while now, and chose to start with
Jarmusch after the recent arrival of a brand-new Blu-Ray copy of Broken
Flowers. With a new film on the horizon (The Dead Don't Die), my inspiration is
at full force and it is time to get the ball rolling, so without further adieu,
stay tuned the next few weeks as Red Eye reviews the films of Jim Jarmusch
one-by-one.
Here is a recap of what will
be reviewed for this series:
Permanent Vacation (1980)
Stranger Than Paradise (1984)
Down by Law (1986)
Mystery Train (1989)
Night on Earth (1991)
Dead Man (1995)
Ghost Dog: The Way of the
Samurai (1999)
Coffee and Cigarettes (2003)
Broken Flowers (2005)
The Limits of Control (2009)
Only Lovers Left Alive (2014)
Paterson (2016)
No comments:
Post a Comment