Part of the Jim Jarmusch ‘All About the Masters’ Series
~ Greatest Favorite ~
As I’ve been writing about
Jarmusch exclusively this past week, I’ve begun to truly realize what makes his
films. It is not so much his way of capturing the mundanity of everyday life,
but the beauty of that same mundanity.
Yes, there is beauty to be found there. Think about that one day when you thought
you were just going about your business, and then you got wrapped up in some
sort of interaction with somebody. Maybe it was one of those talks that somehow
got into existential territory, maybe it was just a discussion about music. Either
way, that conversation wouldn’t have had nearly as much impact if you were
having interactions like that left and right. The interaction demands mundanity
to have had any kind of impact on you.
So, to tie it back to Jarmusch,
here we have Night on Earth.
It brings an almost tearjerking
level of joy to finally get to write the very review you’re reading right now. Night on Earth is one of the very
greatest movies I’ve ever seen. Combined with writing and performances that are
near-perfect, it is one of those magical movies that makes the viewer feel anything
and everything, whether it leaves the viewer with a smile, a tear in their eye,
profound ideas to ponder on for a while, or in stitches out of laughter. And
the most amazing thing is that it’s not even a complex film with some hyper-cerebral
structure; on the contrary, it works on a charmingly simple level.
That very simplicity lies in the
concept of the film itself. The title says exactly when and where the movie
takes place; over the course of one evening, Night on Earth travels all around the globe, following the daily
ventures of a series of cab drivers and one particular fare for their nights.
First, there’s Los Angeles; a movie casting agent (Gena Rowlands) is high
strung over trouble finding the perfect girl for the role. Having just landed
in L.A., she lands in the cab of a tomboy (Winona Ryder) who may or may not be
perfect for the role in question. Next up is New York City, where YoYo
(Giancarlo Esposito) needs to get back to Brooklyn, but is ignored by every cab
in the city. Then Helmut (Armin Mueller-Stahl) pulls up. He’s a clueless German
immigrant who can’t even drive, and the only way YoYo is getting in that cab is
if he gets to drive.
Then we travel to a whole
other continent, landing in Paris. After a cabbie (Isaach De Bankole) has to
abandon a couple of troublesome politicians, his following fare is a woman
(Beatrice Dalle). She is blind, but she proves to have more insight and perspective
than the average person. Not far off is Rome, and a priest with a heart
condition (Paolo Bonacelli) finds himself in the taxi of a driver who can only
be described as wild (Roberto Benigni). The driver is honored to have a priest
in his cab, but can’t restrain himself and confesses all of his sins. Finally, we are in Helsinki. A group of men need a
cab after a night of dejected drinking – one of them in particular just had the
worst day of his life, but the cabbie (Matti Pellonpaa) delivers a sad story
that reminds them that it can always be worse.
Simple premises in movies are
nothing particularly new, but it’s the quality in delivery that becomes a more
diverse talking point. Night on Earth uses
no big techniques to make the film feel bigger than it actually is. No
intercutting between cities, no grand-scale cinematography, nothing. Simply and
episodic series of taxi rides, taking place exclusively in the confines of the
cabs (occasionally taking a gander outside). The only other movie I can think
of that delivers on this level of simplicity is My Dinner with Andre.
And Night on Earth, in spite of its limitations (if you want to call it
that), delivers ten-fold, and it’s purely based on the writing and performances.
Some of Jarmusch’s best writing is present here, from Beatrice Dalle’s profound
take on feeling the world around her in spite of being blind, to Benigni’s
perverted escapades, which results in one of the funniest monologues in movie
history. Every conversation grips you, and you’re simply itching to see where
the conversations go. But this writing would not be possible if it weren’t for
the performances. Like I said earlier, every single performance is pitch
perfect and is in exact tune with the tone of their respective episode.
Night on Earth’s pacing is a subject that doesn’t get enough
credit. As interesting an idea as the film is, it would not be nearly as good
if not for its sense of pacing. Jarmusch knows exactly when to talk, when to
quiet down for a moment, when to take a break to admire the city outside, when
to get the talk going again, and when to wrap the ride up. Not once does it
become boring or grueling, never overstaying its welcome. I could almost argue
that it under-stays its welcome – I would have loved to have seen maybe two or three
more cities.
That last comment is not at
all a criticism; just a “it would be nice if…” comment. That doesn’t matter,
though, because what we got here is one of those few movies where all of the
stars align and is just perfect. To this day, it is a timeless and universal masterpiece
that, over anything else, goes to show that no matter how far across the world
we may be, we have more in common than we may think. That’s the beauty of being
an everyday human, and our next chat with a complete stranger just might prove a
point.
No comments:
Post a Comment