* *
God’s Not Dead: A Light in the Darkness follows the same formulas, indulges
in the same tropes, and pushes the same ethical/political/ideological agenda as its two predecessors, so much so that I was seriously tempted to completely skip out on a proper review and instead give a one-to-two paragraph explanation regarding the lack of a review. Not out of anger, not out of cynicism, but just because there’s really not much to say that hasn’t already been said – what has been said about the first two God’s Not
Dead films is easily applied here. Lucky for you, I’m not the type to cop
out like that. In turn, though, that might result in a fairly bare-bones
review.
Pastor Dave Hill (David A.R.
White) is back once again, a figure of controversy. He has been jailed for
contempt of court after legal confrontation of…something involving his
Christian faith and his refusal to bow down to secularism. He is released the
next morning, greeted by fellow Pastor Jude (Benjamin A. Onyango). Trouble continues
for Dave: his church (which has stood for generations) sits on the territory of
a state college, and the students want it gone.
What is a God’s Not Dead film without a bunch of other characters? Along with
Dave, we also have Keaton (Samantha Boscarino), a student at the college. She
is a Christian, but her faith in Christ is at a very uncertain point. She has a
boyfriend; Adam (Mike C. Manning), who teases her once in a while about her
faith. After an argument, Adam accidentally blows up Dave’s church, and Pastor
Jude is killed in the explosion. With the church in charred ruins, it is on the
brink of being torn down, but Dave has teamed with his agnostic brother Pearce (John Corbett),
a social justice lawyer, to ensure that church stands no matter what.
Oh, and Josh Wheaton (Shane
Harper) is back, who has given up law school to become a minister. There’s
really nothing much more to say beyond that. He’s just there for the audience
to light up in recognition.
I didn’t bother with God’s Not Dead 2, but I did with the
first film, and I can assure you that God’s
Not Dead: A Light in the Darkness does absolutely nothing to garner any
fans from anybody outside the target demographic, let alone convert anybody.
Christians are the good guys, atheists and secularists (well, pretty much
anybody who isn’t a Christian) are the bad guys, but in the usual attempt to
round things out, there are a few non-Christians thrown into the mix, we know
exactly what side they’ll be on by the film’s end. Sound familiar?
That doesn’t mean there’s
nothing to talk about, though. To my pleasant surprise, God’s Not Dead: A Light in the Darkness attempts at some complexity
in its subject matter, instead of the same old us-versus-them mentality that is
otherwise so prevalent. Dave is the primary example: at one point, he has a
violent encounter with a character, and the movie doesn’t apologize for or
justify his actions. He is even confronted when he’s bluntly told that it’s
behavior like that that has bred such a backlash against Christianity. It’s
refreshing to see that somebody at Pure Flix is at least aware.
There’s also something to be
said about the character of Keaton and her struggle of faith (crisis of faith
is one of the most striking subjects in all of cinema), but I cannot give any
praises beyond “it at least has these themes and elements”, because this
complex subject matter is never really explored beyond what we’re given. The
movie just presses on from plot point to plot point, and not particularly
engagingly. Every single exchange of dialogue feels like an exchange between a
pastor and an inquisitive member of their congregation. Dear movie: plot and
sermon are not the same thing. At least try
to be subtle and subversive, which it tries to be, as there is the occasional
quasi-profound statement.
The lack of subtlety
perpetuates, sometimes to insulting degrees. Take, for instance, one of the
progressive secular students. At one point, he is seen recording a video on his
phone. There is an American flag on his phone, and as he records, it is
inverted. How tasteful.
As far as how the film is
made; it’s at least watchable in that regard. Yeah, the set designs are a bit
sterile from time to time, but the production is about what you’d expect from a
film in the God’s Not Dead series. While
there is a “plastic” factor to everything, at least it’s not distracting. That
said, will somebody please tell the
DP to turn down the ISO? So many shots….so unbearably bright. I suppose it’s
trying to be inspirational, but it’s a bit overbearing. At least in the
theater; I can see this being less excruciating at home. Also, it’s decently paced.
It started, said what it had to say, and was done. No dragging from the film,
no restlessness and watch-checks from me, so at least sitting through this wasn’t
a task.
The track record for Christian
cinema is truly a shame. Faith and theology can make for extraordinarily poignant
and touching cinematic experiences. Take The
Tree of Life for instance: it is one of the most unbelievably moving films
I’ve ever seen, and when broken down and analyzed, one will discover it is a
deep testament of Christian faith. Unfortunately, films like The Tree of Life don’t pull the numbers
quite like the God’s Not Dead series
has. This third installment; while not quite as unbearable as its predecessors,
it’s otherwise still same old, same old. For the target audience, you’ll be
told exactly what you heard the last couple of times. For those opposed, save
your breath and energy: nothing new to get huffy over. So, before any ideological debates
start, let’s move on, shall we? There's better movies to be concerned about.